Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit? Judgment and Decision Making 2016 11:352-360.ġ4. Misperceiving bullshit as profound is associated with favorable views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump, and conservatism. It’s still bullshit: reply to Dalton (2016). Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Barr N, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA. Openess/intellect and susceptibility to pseudo-profound bullshit: a replication and extension. Bainbridge TF, Quinlan JA, Mar RA, Smillie LD. Reception and willingness to share pseudo‐profound bullshit and their relation to other epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive ability in Slovakia and Romania. Čavojová V, Secară EC, Jurkovič M, Šrol J. Individual differences in personality predict the use and perceived effectiveness of essential oils. Something’s going on here: psychological predictors of belief in conspiracy theories. Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Postdigital Science and Education 2020 2:9-13.Ħ. Lies, bullshit and fake news: some epistemological concerns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2015 144:674-687.ĥ. Searching for explanations: how the internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2018 76:249-258.ģ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |